Quote:
|
Originally Posted by C. J.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by worzel
I know what you are saying Chris, that it is a level playing field.
But if the playing field is not right to start with then surely somethings wrong?
Who has got the accurate rollers? They all seem to come up different from the sound of things 
Lets say for arguements sake I get 340 & 340 at Surrey and then go to PE and get 350 & 360. Who is right? All I want to know accurately is my figures (without being rude) I don't care to a certain degree what anyone else gets, just that mine are correct. |
Well think bobs wrong as charlie has been rated by many mags as having the most accurate rollers in the country . 
As for compition no its not I'm just saying if every one use's the same rollers its easy to compare |
I totally agree that it is the best way to compare and it is a level playing field.
It's one of those things that all of the rolling roads will say they are better than others, or will have truer readings. At Power engineering, when I had mine done before it had been tinkered with, it was pretty spot on to what it should have been after a year. What should have been when new 301bhp was 299bhp and torque when new should have 305nm and was 302nm. That was with the car being in unmolested form and as Prodrive supplied it, which says to me that their rollers are (or at least were)pretty accurate.
I'm not trying to be arguementative here at all. I would just like to know who's rollers actually are the most accurate. As they will ALL say that theirs are.
The only way to compare is to all go to the same rolling road, I agree with that without question.
I would just like to know which one would give me the true figures of my car? I'm not going to be gutted if my car shows figures down on Bobs Ekutec Road Dyno, as I know that my car feels strong enough for what I want. And that is all that really counts
Although......... I will get extremely pissed off and probably stomp out if I get readings of 212bhp & 212nm
