Quote:
Originally Posted by jura11
Guys,but you are still don't understand,what will be with people which don't have SKY,i'm not preparing pay for SKY money.I'm all ready paying for BBC licence.
For people which have SKY,yes its OK,but not for us which don't have SKY.
That's my point.
Jura
|
I do get the point, however I don't think the only downside here is the potential cost for those choosing to get Sky in order to watch the coverage. Personally I don't like the way Sky produce any of their content. I find their news broadcasts and the sport I have seen through them (forced to watch football at brother in-laws house) to be tacky at best, although that is only my perspective.
I have Sky, but only because where I live we cannot get a clear Freeview signal and so in order to watch even BBC1, 2, ITV and C4 we have to have Satellite. As such I only have a basic package with limited channels and no sport given I have no interest in anything they currently show. I can't see myself paying however much more to have a million sport channels purely to get the F1 every couple of weeks.
When the changeover happens we will of course have a better idea of the outcome and if by all reports the Sky coverage turns out to be as good or better than it is currently then I may be tempted. For whatever reason I just can't see it being that good though.